Current:Home > Finance'It is war': Elon Musk's X sues ad industry group over 'boycott' of Twitter replacement -FutureWise Finance
'It is war': Elon Musk's X sues ad industry group over 'boycott' of Twitter replacement
View
Date:2025-04-18 00:51:55
Elon Musk’s social media company X, formerly known as Twitter, has filed a lawsuit against a group of advertisers, accusing them of violating antitrust laws while boycotting the platform.
Filed on Tuesday in the United States District Court for the District of Northern Texas, the lawsuit alleges that the Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM), “conspired” to “collectively withhold billions in advertising revenue” from the company. Among those brands specifically cited in the lawsuit are CVS, Unilever, Mars, and Danish renewable energy company Orsted.
GARM is an initiative under the World Federation of Advertisers, that works to works to help brands avoid advertising alongside illegal or harmful content.
The boycotts, which included dozens of companies along with those specifically named in the lawsuit, stemmed from concerns that what was then known as Twitter did not properly adhere to GARM’s content safety standards.
The lawsuit alleges, however, that these boycotts were a violation of antitrust laws, calling them a “coercive exercise of market power by advertisers acting to collectively promote their own economic interests through commercial restraints at the expense of social media platforms and their users.”
X executives respond
Linda Yaccarino, the chief executive officer of X, penned an open letter on Tuesday, alleging that the boycotts had cost the company billions of dollars in revenue.
“To put it simply, people are hurt when the marketplace of ideas is undermined and some viewpoints are not funded over others as part of an illegal boycott,” Yaccarino wrote.
Musk was somewhat blunter in his own Tuesday statement, saying on X, “We tried peace for 2 years, now it is war.”
According to the lawsuit, the boycotts began in November 2022, shortly after Musk acquired the company, and were due to concerns that Musk’s pledges to loosen content restrictions would leave the platform no longer compliant with GARM’s standards.
While lawsuit alleges that the company has subsequently applied brand safety standards that are comparable to those of GARM, the boycotts have continued.
A longstanding contentious relationship
The social media giant has had a contentious relationship with advertisers over content moderation since Musk acquired the company in 2022.
When speaking at the New York Times DealBook summit last November, shortly after several major companies including Apple, IBM and Walt Disney had pulled ads from X after Musk called an antisemitic post on the platform “the actual truth,” Musk lashed out, calling the advertising boycott “blackmail” and repeatedly telling those advertisers to “(expletive) yourself.”
In July 2023, X Corp. filed a lawsuit against the Center for Countering Digital Hate, a non-profit that published reports on hate speech on the platform, alleging that they were damaging to the business interests of the company.
That lawsuit was dismissed by a judge in March.
X Corp. also sued media watchdog group Media Matters in November, 2023, claiming that the group’s report showing advertisements appearing next to posts on X that praised Adolf Hitler and the Nazi party were misleading and defaming. That lawsuit is set to head to trial in April, 2025.
Max Hauptman is a Trending Reporter for USA TODAY. He can be reached at MHauptman@gannett.com
veryGood! (64178)
Related
- Macy's says employee who allegedly hid $150 million in expenses had no major 'impact'
- Walmart announces annual bonus payments for full- and part-time US hourly workers
- Tim Scott, a potential Trump VP pick, launches a $14 million outreach effort to minority voters
- The Best Target Father’s Day Gifts of 2024 That’re Affordable & Will Earn You Favorite Child Status
- Moving abroad can be expensive: These 5 countries will 'pay' you to move there
- Walmart announces annual bonus payments for full- and part-time US hourly workers
- Video of man pushing Black superintendent at daughter's graduation sparks racism claims
- McDonald's loses Big Mac trademark as EU court sides with Irish rival Supermac's
- Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
- Broad City Star Abbi Jacobson Marries Jodi Balfour
Ranking
- Rams vs. 49ers highlights: LA wins rainy defensive struggle in key divisional game
- Dogs are mauling and killing more people. What to do pits neighbor against neighbor
- Tinashe Reveals the Surprising Inspiration Behind Her Viral Song “Nasty”
- From 'Saving Private Ryan' to 'The Longest Day,' D-Day films to watch on 80th anniversary
- As Trump Enters Office, a Ripe Oil and Gas Target Appears: An Alabama National Forest
- Opening arguments starting in class-action lawsuit against NFL by ‘Sunday Ticket’ subscribers
- Powerball winning numbers for June 5 drawing: Jackpot climbs to $206 million
- Stock market today: Asian stocks rise after Wall Street barrels to records
Recommendation
IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
Lawyer wants to move the trial for the killing of a University of Mississippi student
Selma Blair Shares Health Update Amid Multiple Sclerosis Remission
Texas Droughts Are Getting Much More Expensive
Sonya Massey's father decries possible release of former deputy charged with her death
A look back at D-Day: Why the World War II invasion remains important on its 80th anniversary
Election certification disputes in a handful of states spark concerns over presidential contest
Fashion has always been political. Are celebrities, designers at a turning point?