Current:Home > MarketsIn Texas case, federal appeals panel says emergency care abortions not required by 1986 law -FutureWise Finance
In Texas case, federal appeals panel says emergency care abortions not required by 1986 law
View
Date:2025-04-15 01:20:42
NEW ORLEANS (AP) — The Biden administration cannot use a 1986 emergency care law to require hospitals in Texas hospitals to provide abortions for women whose lives are at risk due to pregnancy, a federal appeals court ruled Tuesday.
It’s one of numerous cases involving abortion restrictions that have played out in state and federal courts after the U.S. Supreme Court ended abortion rights in 2022. The administration issued guidance that year saying hospitals “must” provide abortion services if there’s a risk to the mother’s life, citing the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act of 1986, which requires emergency rooms to provide stabilizing treatment for anyone who arrives at the emergency room.
Texas state courts have also been brought separate cases about when abortion must be allowed there, despite bans on it under most circumstances. The Texas Supreme Court ruled last month against a woman who asked for permission to abort a fetus with a fatal diagnosis. The same court heard arguments in November on behalf of women who were denied abortions despite serious risks to their health if they continued their pregnancies; the justices have not ruled on that case.
Abortion opponents have challenged the emergency care law guidance in multiple jurisdictions. In Texas, the state joined abortion opponents in a lawsuit to stop the guidance from taking effect and won at the district court level. The Biden administration appealed to the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which has jurisdiction in Texas, Louisiana and Mississippi. But the appeal was rejected in Tuesday’s ruling by a unanimous three-judge panel.
The ruling said the guidance cannot be used to require emergency care abortions in Texas or by members of two anti-abortion groups that filed suit — the American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists and the Christian Medical & Dental Associations. The California-based 9th Circuit has allowed use of the guidance to continue in an Idaho case, which is pending at the U.S. Supreme Court.
Opponents of the guidance said Texas law already allows abortions to save the life of the mother, but that the federal guidance went too far, calling for abortions when an emergency condition is not present and eliminating obligations to treat the unborn child.
The 5th Circuit panel sided with Texas. The opinion said language in the 1986 emergency care law requires hospitals to stabilize the pregnant woman and her fetus.
“We agree with the district court that EMTALA does not provide an unqualified right for the pregnant mother to abort her child especially when EMTALA imposes equal stabilization obligations,” said the opinion written by Judge Kurt Engelhardt.
In the appellate hearing last November, a U.S. Justice Department attorney arguing for the administration said the guidance provides needed safeguards for women, and that the district court order blocking the use of the guidance was an error with “potentially devastating consequences for pregnant women within the state of Texas.”
The panel that ruled Tuesday included Engelhardt and Cory Wilson, nominated to the court by former President Donald Trump, and Leslie Southwick, nominated by former President George W. Bush.
veryGood! (1217)
Related
- Louvre will undergo expansion and restoration project, Macron says
- Spoilers! What to know about that big twist in 'The Diplomat' finale
- These Luxury Goods Last Forever (And Will Help You Save Money)
- What time do stores open on Black Friday? Hours for TJ Maxx, Home Depot, IKEA, more
- How to watch new prequel series 'Dexter: Original Sin': Premiere date, cast, streaming
- 4 easy ways to find, enjoy scary stories this Halloween: Video
- CeeDee Lamb injury update: Cowboys WR exits vs. Falcons with shoulder injury
- Spoilers! What to know about that big twist in 'The Diplomat' finale
- Pregnant Kylie Kelce Shares Hilarious Question Her Daughter Asked Jason Kelce Amid Rising Fame
- Takeaways from AP’s report on how immigration transformed a Minnesota farm town
Ranking
- Pressure on a veteran and senator shows what’s next for those who oppose Trump
- Antarctica’s Fate Will Impact the World. Is It Time to Give The Region a Voice at Climate Talks?
- Tucker Carlson is back in the spotlight, again. What message does that send?
- Harris won’t say how she voted on California measure that would reverse criminal justice reforms
- Have Dry, Sensitive Skin? You Need To Add These Gentle Skincare Products to Your Routine
- Federal judge lets Iowa keep challenging voter rolls although naturalized citizens may be affected
- Former Kentucky officer found guilty of violating Breonna Taylor's civil rights
- 19 Things Every Grown-up Bathroom Should Have
Recommendation
Global Warming Set the Stage for Los Angeles Fires
Antarctica’s Fate Will Impact the World. Is It Time to Give The Region a Voice at Climate Talks?
Texas AG Ken Paxton sues Dallas doctor over providing hormone treatments to minors
Mega Millions winning numbers for November 1 drawing: Jackpot rises to $303 million
Backstage at New York's Jingle Ball with Jimmy Fallon, 'Queer Eye' and Meghan Trainor
5 dead after vehicle crashes into tree in Wisconsin
Hugh Jackman Marvelously Reacts to Martha Stewart's Comments About Ryan Reynolds' Humor
Do high ticket prices for games affect sports fan behavior? Experts weigh in.