Current:Home > ScamsIowa governor signs bill that gives state authority to arrest and deport some migrants -FutureWise Finance
Iowa governor signs bill that gives state authority to arrest and deport some migrants
View
Date:2025-04-15 06:39:46
DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — It will be a state crime for a person to be in Iowa if previously denied admission to or removed from the United States under a bill signed into law by Gov. Kim Reynolds on Wednesday.
The law, which takes effect July 1, has elevated anxiety in Iowa’s immigrant communities and has prompted questions among legal experts and law enforcement on how it will be enforced. It mirrors part of a Texas law that is currently blocked in court.
In Iowa and across the country, Republican leaders have accused President Joe Biden of neglecting his responsibilities to enforce federal immigration law, leading Republican governors to send troops to Texas and legislatures to propose a variety of state-level strategies.
“The Biden Administration has failed to enforce our nation’s immigration laws, putting the protection and safety of Iowans at risk,” Reynolds said in a statement after signing the bill. “This bill gives Iowa law enforcement the power to do what he is unwilling to do: enforce immigration laws already on the books.”
After the Legislature passed the bill, Des Moines Police Chief Dana Wingert told The Associated Press in an email in March that immigration status does not factor into the department’s work to keep the community safe. He said the force is “not equipped, funded or staffed” to take on responsibilities that are the federal government’s.
“Simply stated, not only do we not have the resources to assume this additional task, we don’t even have the ability to perform this function,” Wingert said.
Shawn Ireland, president of the Iowa State Sheriffs and Deputies Association and a deputy sheriff in Linn County, also said in a March email that law enforcement officials would have to consult with county attorneys for guidance on implementation and enforcement.
The Iowa legislation, like the Texas law, could mean criminal charges for people who have outstanding deportation orders or who have previously been removed from or denied admission to the U.S. Once in custody, migrants could either agree to a judge’s order to leave the U.S. or be prosecuted.
The judge’s order must identify the transportation method for leaving the U.S. and a law enforcement officer or Iowa agency to monitor migrants’ departures. Those who don’t leave could face rearrest under more serious charges.
The Texas law is stalled in court after a challenge from the U.S. Department of Justice that says it conflicts with the federal government’s immigration authority.
The bill in Iowa faces the same questions of implementation and enforcement as the Texas law, since deportation is a “complicated, expensive and often dangerous” federal process, said immigration law expert Huyen Pham of Texas A&M School of Law.
In the meantime, Iowa’s immigrant community groups are organizing informational meetings and materials to try to answer people’s questions. They’re also asking local and county law enforcement agencies for official statements, as well as face-to-face meetings.
At one community meeting in Des Moines, 80 people gathered and asked questions in Spanish, including: “Should I leave Iowa?”
Others asked: “Is it safe to call the police?” “Can Iowa police ask me about my immigration status?” And: “What happens if I’m racially profiled?”
veryGood! (416)
Related
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- Inside Clean Energy: In California, the World’s Largest Battery Storage System Gets Even Larger
- How much is your reputation worth?
- New Jersey school bus monitor charged with manslaughter after allegedly using phone as disabled girl suffocated
- Former Syrian official arrested in California who oversaw prison charged with torture
- Bill Gates on next-generation nuclear power technology
- Rural Pennsylvanians Set to Vote for GOP Candidates Who Support the Natural Gas Industry
- The $1.6 billion Dominion v. Fox News trial starts Tuesday. Catch up here
- EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
- Man who ambushed Fargo officers searched kill fast, area events where there are crowds, officials say
Ranking
- Questlove charts 50 years of SNL musical hits (and misses)
- The loneliness of Fox News' Bret Baier
- Vivek Ramaswamy reaches donor threshold for first Republican presidential primary debate
- How much is your reputation worth?
- Spooky or not? Some Choa Chu Kang residents say community garden resembles cemetery
- NPR quits Twitter after being falsely labeled as 'state-affiliated media'
- Businesses face more and more pressure from investors to act on climate change
- Mega Millions jackpot grows to an estimated $820 million, with a possible cash payout of $422 million
Recommendation
See you latte: Starbucks plans to cut 30% of its menu
Newly elected United Auto Workers leader strikes militant tone ahead of contract talks
Earth Has a 50-50 Chance of Hitting a Grim Global Warming Milestone in the Next Five Years
Rep. Tony Gonzales, who represents 800 miles of U.S.-Mexico border, calls border tactics not acceptable
Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
The $1.6 billion Dominion v. Fox News trial starts Tuesday. Catch up here
Why Tia Mowry Says Her 2 Kids Were Part of Her Decision to Divorce Cory Hardrict
Twitter labels NPR's account as 'state-affiliated media,' which is untrue